Catalyst Ukraine War
Better known is a March 2022 decision: under the impression of the Russian attack on Ukraine, the Commission announced its "REPowerEU" plan. It marked a turnaround: From now on, the discussion about hydrogen focused not primarily on sustainability, but on security of supply. "Energy independence" became the buzzword.
Plans to diversify energy imports, including through LNG, coincided with this period. But which energy carrier is better suited to establishing energy independence than hydrogen, which can potentially be produced everywhere and was a core component of the Green Deal anyway?
The chicken-and-egg problem
While hydrogen has since experienced increasing publicity throughout Europe, the demand for concrete measures has also become louder. The industrial and energy sectors in particular are faced with the question of whether and when it is worth investing in hydrogen. The dilemma is what many call the chicken-and-egg problem:
If potential producers and grid operators invest in hydrogen production, storage or transport, there might end up being no or insufficient demand for their supply – not to mention unresolved legal issues, especially in the transmission grid sector. Producers and grid operators fear losing a lot of money on such stranded assets. Conversely, many municipalities and companies that could use hydrogen are hesitant to invest in corresponding infrastructures and technology because it is unclear whether there will be enough hydrogen available in the future. This particularly affects the process industry.